Monday, June 30, 2008

The Golden Opportunity of the 21st Century

Reasons Why You Should Invest In RD Wind Power

1. Green and renewable energy are the main focus and hot issues of the world – The energy and environmental crisis, especially the global warming problem which is highly related to green house gas emission, are the main focus of today’s world. President George W. Bush has announced in January 2007 to invest hundreds of billions of US dollars in developing solutions for green and renewable energies.
2. Smaller is better – The best solution to the world’s crisis – RD technology significantly increases efficiency, reduces cost, and the equipment can be mass-produced quickly for large-scale wind farms. It provides the U.S.A and the world with the best solution to the Kyoto Protocol.
3. Huge market size and business potential that no one can refuse - The global wind power market size is estimated to be about 3.36 trillion USD. Wind power installation capacity is estimated to reach at least 20% of overall electricity supply, i.e. about 2,100,000 MW wind power are to be installed globally in the near future. Global wind power installation capacity is only about 74,000 MW as of December 2006. In other words, the global wind power installation capacity is expected to grow 30 times from current level. USA alone is expected to grow from current 11,000 MW installed capacity to at least 600,000 MW by year 2020. it’s an almost 60 times capacity increase from current level that no one can ignore.
4. Double the return on investment for investors of wind farms - Compared to most conventional wind turbines, the RD Wind Power system doubles the electricity output of others in the same scale under the same wind energy condition. In other words, the ROI for wind farm investors is more than doubled and the payback period is shortened.
5. Shorten the lead-time for return on investment by ¾ - The lead-time for a 3MW turnkey system is shortened to 6 months from current 24 months of conventional wind power project. In other words, the RD wind power system can start earning income in about 6 months after contract is signed and initial funding is received.
6. Triple the power output when works together with conventional wind turbines – For wind farms with conventional wind turbines installed, the total electricity output of the land can be doubled or even tripled by adding RD wind power and using the space that is originally wasted between large and tall wind turbines.
7. “Blue Ocean” competition due to advanced, unique and proven technology – Advanced, unique and global patented technology avoids “Red Ocean” market competition. The RD technology is acknowledged, endorsed and supported by national developing funds. It has solved most of the disadvantages and problems of existing wind turbines, e.g. inefficient, expensive, huge, over-sized, heavy, difficult and long development, manufacturing and installation time.
8. Ecologically Sound – RD wind power has big advantages over conventional wind turbines in noise and landscaping. Further more, it does not hurt migrating birds due to much lower linear velocity and the softer type blade material.
9. Blue Sky and Clean Environment - Green and renewable energy absolutely protects the environment. RD wind power is ecologically sound to benefit the whole world and restore blue sky to humans.

Source: www.rdwindpower.com

UK to expand wind energy programme

25/06/2008

Plans for a massive expansion of a wind energy programme in the UK are to be unveiled by the Government.

They will include the building of 7000 wind turbines both in the countryside and around the coast.

Sustainable energy schemes will become much more common, and change to our landscapes, towns and cities is inevitable, the government will say.

Faced with ageing nuclear power stations, soaring oil prices and a need to cut Britain’s CO2 emissions by 60 per cent by 2050, Prime Minister Gordon Brown is determined to press ahead with a green energy blueprint to transform how the UK generates its power.

This will include a new generation of nuclear power stations being built alongside a huge expansion in wind energy.

Many proposed wind farm schemes have become bogged down by red tape with more than 7,000 megawatts of wind energy capacity stuck in the planning system.

But a new Planning Bill will see the application system streamlined so farms can be brought onstream much more quickly.

Individuals and communities will be encouraged to get involved and set up co-operative schemes to buy, run and produce their own electricity.

The Government is committed to obtaining 15 per cent of all its energy from renewable sources by 2020 and offshore wind power has been identified as the key factor in reaching the target.

Up to half of the target will have to come from electricity, meaning a third of electricity will have to come from renewables by 2020.

The UK has the best wind resources in Europe and although only 2.4GW of power comes from wind farms at the moment, another 19GW is in development.

The British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) estimates that within five years the UK will be able to obtain as much power from wind as it does from nuclear plants.

The wind energy industry is confident of delivering 33GW of electricity - more than one-third of our current generating capacity - by 2020 as long as policy and planning obstacles are removed.

Capacity from wind has been growing at 86 per cent per year and the UK is about to overtake Denmark as the world’s largest generator of onshore wind power.

The Government will claim that polling has shown that the vast majority of people - 80 per cent - favour the use of wind power and that almost two-thirds (64 per cent) would be happy to live within 5km of a wind power development.

When he makes the announcement, Energy Minister John Hutton will claim that wind farms are capable of bringing massive economic and social benefits to communities.

He will say that in Denmark, 80 per cent of onshore wind turbines are owned by individuals or wind co-operatives while in Spain developers are required to identify the benefits they will bring to the local economy through job creation and the use of local suppliers.

As well as cutting carbon emissions and reducing dependency on oil and gas, a growing wind industry would offer business opportunities and could create as many as 160,000 new jobs by 2020.

The Government hopes that its firm plans will encourage investors to pump more money into renewable energy schemes and help stimulate the growth of a turbine manufacturing industry.

At the moment demand outstrips supply and with only two major manufacturers -Siemens and Vestas - there is a two-year waiting list for turbines to be delivered.

The Government also plans to push ahead with plans to upgrade the electricity grid to ensure the delivery of green electricity and also to overcome fears by the Ministry of Defence that big offshore wind farms will interfere with radar.

Several schemes have been delayed because of late planning objections by the MoD.

The plans were welcomed by environmental groups.

Friends of the Earth said the renewable energy consultation would a golden opportunity for the Government to tackle the dual challenges of climate change and spiralling fuel prices.

Greenpeace executive director John Sauven said: "If the government actually means it this time then Britain will become a better, safer and more prosperous country. We could create jobs, reduce our dependence on foreign oil and use less gas, and in the long run our power bills will come down. But it won’t happen without real government action."

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/06/25/eawindfarms125.xml

A Second Wind for Aging Wind Turbines

26-06-2008

EUROPE'S CARBON CHALLENGE

A two-year wait for new turbines is forcing some buyers into the secondhand market to meet the EU's carbon reduction targets.

The 100 or so inhabitants of the Isle of Gigha, off the west coast of Scotland, aren't your typical trendsetters. Yet when this small island community spent $870,000 for three secondhand Vestas back in 2004, it became one of the first buyers to tap Europe's blossoming market for used wind turbines.

Now churning out enough power to meet almost all of Gigha's annual electricity needs, the 675-kilowatt wind farm has significantly cut the island's carbon dioxide footprint while generating an annual $150,000 profit for Gigha Renewable Energy, the locally owned company that operates the turbines. "To be honest, we bought them for financial reasons," says Jacqui MacLeod, manager of the Isle of Gigha Heritage Trust.

The success of Gigha's reconditioned turbines—known locally as the Dancing Ladies—highlights a fast-growing new market created by the global boom in wind-generated power. The almost two-year waiting period for new turbines from the likes of General Electric and Siemens is forcing some buyers into the secondhand market to meet the European Union's CO2 reduction targets. Moreover, used turbines cost 40 percent less than new turbines, and their typically smaller size makes it easier to get local approval for their installation.

Strong Demand from Corporate Customers

While secondhand turbines have been sold in Europe for almost 15 years, the slow trickle now reaching the market will soon turn into a flood. Utilities such as Germany's E.ON and Spain's Iberdrola plan to upgrade their existing renewable capacity over the next five years. That means more than 5,000 secondhand machines are expected to go on the market by 2013. At roughly $230,000 each, that's more than $1.1 billion worth of Dancing Ladies.

Who's likely to buy them? Windbrokers, a turbine dealer based in the Dutch city of Maarsbergen, says it has already sold more than 350 to companies such as GlaxoSmithKline and Nissan Motor, which installed them to generate electricity for their plants across Europe. Utility companies in emerging markets also are buying. "We're seeing huge demand from Eastern Europe, Asia, and Latin America," says Dick Vermeulen, Windbrokers' managing director.

Besides their relatively low cost, secondhand models are attractive to companies and utilities that are just getting into the wind-power business, giving them a chance to gain a few years' experience with smaller turbines before upgrading to newer models.

A Boon for Big Utilities

The emergence of this secondary market also is a boon to big utilities looking to dismantle outdated wind farms. Although wind turbines usually can operate for 20 years, many utilities retire them after 10 years and install more-efficient equipment. "If you can recycle the turbines, then that's a cost you don't have to incur," says Juliet Davenport, chief executive of British renewables firm Good Energy.

Reconditioned turbines may not be right for everyone. They're frequently not covered by manufacturers' warranties, and repair costs on aging equipment can mount quickly. Those expenses, along with investment needed to connect turbines to the electrical grid, puts them out of reach for some customers.

Even so, Windbrokers reckons demand for used turbines will continue to outstrip supply. The company, founded by Vermeulen in 2002, has seen revenues soar from $3.1 million in 2004 to an estimated $108.6 million this year. It's now starting to sell new turbines, as well as offering services such as guarantees on reconditioned equipment.

With soaring energy prices and increasing pressure to reduce carbon emissions, analysts say the economics of secondhand turbines are likely to look better and better in the next few years. For the Isle of Gigha, those Dancing Ladies are already looking very good indeed.

Source: http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,562161,00.html

Wind: The Power. The Promise. The Business

June 26, 2008

A partial answer to America's energy crisis is springing up. But the struggle to harness the winds of Kansas shows the difficulty in building an industry that threatens the status quo

It's an ordinary day on Pete Ferrell's 7,000-acre ranch in the Flint Hills of southeastern Kansas. Meaning, it's really windy. When he drives his silver Toyota Tundra out of the canyon where the ranch buildings nestle, the truck rocks from the gusts. Up on top of a ridge, surrounded by a sweeping vista of low hills, rippling grass, and towering wind turbines that make you feel like a mouse scampering underfoot, Ferrell carefully navigates into a spot where the wind won't damage the doors when they're opened. Then he points to an old-style windmill, used for pumping water, which was erected by his father decades earlier when the ranch was in the throes of a drought. "That's the windmill that saved us in the '30s," he explains, his voice growing husky with emotion.


Ferrell, 55, is a fourth-generation Kansan who looks the part. He's slim with gray hair, squint-lines, and a cowboy hat. His great-grandfather established Ferrell Ranch on the high plains east of Wichita in 1888, and it has nearly failed several times over the years. Ferrell has held the place together through cattle grazing, oil wells, and, now, wind. He owns the land under 50 of the 100 turbines of the Elk River Wind Project, a 150-megawatt wind farm that opened in 2005.

Ferrell is one of the fathers of Kansas wind farming. He ran through three different developers before getting the operation going on his land. There was stiff opposition to wind farming in the Flint Hills from preservationists concerned about marring the landscape and from politicians tied to the coal industry, but, finally, Ferrell had his way. He now travels the state as an evangelist. "He has been a great spokesman for wind in Kansas," says Mark Lawlor, project manager in the state for Horizon Wind Energy, a wind farm developer. "He has lived off the land, and he's found something new he can tap into."

For centuries, the wind has been the enemy of the farmer. It blows away soil, dries out crops, and the howling makes some people crazy. So it's a twist of fate that wind is now emerging as an ally. Some call the vast American prairie the Saudi Arabia of wind, capable of producing enough electricity to meet the entire country's needs—assuming there's the will to harness it.

Wind power, while still just a speck in America's total energy mix, is no longer some fantasy of the Birkenstock set. In the U.S., more than 25,000 turbines produce 17 gigawatts of electricity-generating capacity, enough to power 4.5 million homes. Total capacity rose 45% last year and is forecast to nearly triple by 2012. Right now, only 1% of the country's electricity comes from wind, but government and industry leaders want to see that share hit 20% by 2030, both to boost the supply of carbon-free energy and to create green-collar jobs.

Such a transformation won't come easily. While much of America's wind energy is in the Midwest, demand for electricity is on the coasts. And the electrical grid, designed decades ago, can't move large quantities of electricity thousands of miles. There's plenty of wind off the coasts, but it's both expensive to harness and controversial; not-in-my-backyard sentiment has slowed some of the most high-profile projects.

Kansas, in the middle of the wind belt, has become a battleground for the wind revolution. Advocates of alternative energy are pitted against defenders of the status quo, which in Kansas means coal. The flash point: a proposal by Sunflower Electric Power to build two 700-megawatt, coal-fired power plants in western Kansas. State regulators denied permits on the basis of CO2 emissions, the Republican-controlled legislature passed bills to overturn the ruling, Democratic Governor Kathleen Sebelius vetoed the bills, and the legislature has narrowly sustained her vetoes. So ferocious is this fight that Sunflower and its allies placed ads in newspapers suggesting that because Sebelius is against their coal project she's playing into the hands of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The poisoned atmosphere helps explain why Kansas has only 364megawatts of wind power capacity from about 300 turbines, despite having some of the hardest-blowing wind in the country, while Texas produces more than 10 times as much.

ELECTRICITY HIGHWAY
Making matters worse, Kansas has a poor electrical transmission
grid. Most of the coal-fired plants are clustered around Kansas City in the east, yet most of the wind energy is on the thinly populated plains to the west. Now, emboldened by Sebelius' interest in wind energy, independent transmission outfits are lining up to build high-capacity lines from the windy west to consumers not only within the state but also beyond its borders. The U.S. Energy Dept., among others, would like to build the equivalent of an interstate highway system for transporting electricity around the country—if it could only find a budget for it. The part of the project targeting wind alone would cost about $20 billion. Another hang-up: Major new transmission projects take up to four years to get approval from municipalities and state utility authorities. "The process just doesn't work," says Joseph L. Welch, chief executive of ITC Holdings, a Michigan-based transmission company that hopes to build a major line through wind country.

The struggles to get wind projects going weigh on Ferrell's mind as he drives west on Route 96 through Wichita, Hutchinson, Great Bend, and the smaller towns of Albert, Timken, and Rush Center. Ferrell is on his way to tiny Bazine, a community in Ness County 208 miles from his home, to talk to landowners who have banded together to attract a wind farm developer. This is his new gig. He travels the state advising locals on how to get projects going, sometimes collecting consulting fees from landowners. He also is working with partners who have money to develop his own projects. "I learned my lessons in the Flint Hills. [Wind opponents] beat me up good. Now I know how to get things done," says Ferrell.

In Great Bend, Ferrell passes a gas-fired power plant operated by Sunflower. Running a utility company isn't simple. Since electricity can't be stored cheaply, you have to match supply and demand. Typically, that's done with a combination of low-cost coal and nuclear power, gas plants like this one that can be started quickly, and wind and other alternatives. Wind blows harder at some times than others, so you can't depend on a steady supply—though that may change in a few years if there are enough wind farms in different places.

Coal, for the most part, is a cheaper alternative. It costs Sunflower about 1.5 cents per kilowatt-hour to produce electricity at coal plants, 10 cents to 14 cents in gas plants, and 4.5 cents for the electricity it buys from wind farms. But the economics of energy are changing fast. Coal prices have doubled in a year. And if you compare the costs of coal from new plants with wind energy from new wind farms, taking into account capital costs, they're roughly comparable, according to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, which is funded by the Energy Dept.

"BATTLEGROUND" FOR THE NATION
Still, Sunflower hopes to forge ahead with its new coal plants, with a victory either in the legislature or the courts. Earl Watkins, its chief executive, complains that Kansas didn't have the right to deny permits because CO2 emissions are not specifically cited in the regulations. "It's like being pulled over and ticketed by a policeman for running a stop sign—and there's no stop sign there," he says.

This point will be debated in legislatures and courtrooms across the land over the coming years. "We have become a battleground for the whole nation," says Lieutenant Governor Mark Parkinson, a Democrat, who has spearheaded Kansas' energy initiatives. CO2, which has been linked to global warming, is not covered by most environmental rules. Yet other states are turning down coal plant permits for the same reasons Kansas did. In fact, wind power advocates argue that if the cost to the environment and the economy of CO2 emissions were included when comparing the expense of running coal plants vs. wind farms, wind would be cheaper.

In Bazine, a town with a smattering of houses, Ferrell pulls up in front of the Golden Years Senior Center. It's a single-story metal building on the edge of a cornfield. Inside, he helps rough-handed farmers set up folding chairs, and soon most seats are filled. Ferrell gives a primer on wind. Landowners typically get about $2,000 per turbine per year, but he advises them to stick together to gain negotiating strength on price. Also, they should own a piece of the project, not just collect lease royalties. He adds he'd be willing to develop their project or be a consultant.

Meetings like this are happening all over Kansas. More than a dozen projects are on the drawing board, and a slew of wind farm developers are aggressively mapping out the plains and ridgelines looking for the best locations for turbines. In some cases, they attempt to cut secret deals, giving different landowners different prices. That tends to anger the locals and is why the folks in Ness County decided to unite. "There's a wind rush going on out here," says Terry Antenen, who is one of the organizers. "Instead of being picked off, we're going out and picking our developer." He says he trusts Ferrell for advice more than he would an outsider.

On Ferrell's drive home from Bazine, the night sky is lit up with Kansas fireworks—huge lightning strikes. Thanks to the wind farm fees, he says, he has been paying off mortgages on his land. Now he has tied up with Tom Rinehart, a natural gas entrepreneur, to develop wind farms. In time, he hopes to hand off the Ferrell Ranch to his two children, now in college. And if things go really well, he says, he'll set up a foundation dedicated to community development within the Flint Hills.

HELP FROM WASHINGTON
He's sensitive about prairie protection issues. Some former friends in the Flint Hills who oppose putting turbines there don't speak to him anymore. "It's sad what he's doing," says Susan Barnes, owner of the Grand Central Hotel in Cottonwood Falls. "I'm sure wind helped save his ranch, but there are other ways."

The era of the small-time wind developer may already be passing, anyway. Ferrell says it's tough to compete with big outfits with economies of scale and easier access to capital. It costs roughly $225 million to build a 150-megawatt wind plant. Horizon, the big wind developer, has 11,000 megawatts of projects in the works and is hoping to add Ness County to the list. A few days after the meeting in Bazine, Ferrell calls Antenen to say he won't bid on the project. There's a shortage of good transmission lines in the area, and it could take several years to upgrade them.

Even the big players need government help to get major wind projects off the ground. Twenty-five states require their utilities to use a percentage of renewable energy, and in all of them, alternative-energy projects rely on the federal government's production tax credit. That expires at the end of this year, so wind advocates are pressing Congress to renew it. In the past, every time it was allowed to expire, wind development plummeted the following year.

It's morning at the Ferrell Ranch. In the house the family built in 1923, Ferrell's mother, 95-year-old Isabelle, sits in the living room while Pete helps her put on support stockings. A tiny woman with a shock of white hair, she says she likes to look at the wind turbines outlined against the blue sky. Her favorite memories, she says, are of riding the range on horseback in the old days with her late husband, Jack. "He'd say we're just stewards of the land," she says. "It's Pete's feeling and mine. You've got to take care of the land."

Source: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_27/b4091046392398_page_1.htm

The Rise of Indian Wind Power

12/06/2008

TULSI TANTI'S SUCCESS STORY

Indian businessman Tulsi Tanti has built one of the world's largest wind turbine companies in an incredibly short amount of time. Now that he has bought a German company, however, his popularity may be on the wane.

The water buffalo stands, like a statue, in the middle of the path, staring at the SUV bearing down on it at an alarming speed. The driver honks his horn and revs the engine, but the animal doesn't budge a centimeter. It's accustomed to giant machines -- much, much bigger than the one coming at it.

Long convoys of heavy, oversized trucks are a regular spectacle as they pass through the farming communities near the Indian city of Dhule. The flatbed vehicles carry steel pipes, heavy generators and 40-meter (131-foot) blades. The materials stand in stark contrast to the rural surroundings, where the India of the future is taking shape not far from the local farmers' teams of oxen. Dhule is the home of India's largest wind farm.

Hundreds of white towers already protrude from the barren landscape of the Maharashtra Plateau. The wind farm now produces 640 megawatts of electricity, and it will produce 1,100 once construction is complete -- the equivalent of one nuclear power plant. It is the fullfillment of Tulsi Tanti's dream, a dream he has turned into reality in the short space of 13 years. As dreams go, Tanti's is a big one. Suzlon Energy, the company he founded in 1995, is already the world's fifth-largest wind turbine manufacturer, and Tanti himself, who is worth $3 billion (€1.9 billion), is one of India's richest men.

His more established competitors in Europe realized long ago how much of a threat this short man, with his carefully combed hair and thin moustache, posed. Despite his serious demeanor and modest appearance, Tanti is known for his cunning and aggressive takeover tactics.

Interest in his Solution

His name is already mentioned in the same breath as that of steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal and Ratan Tata, president of the Tata Group, which acquired British carmaker Jaguar in 2008. And Tanti is still a long way from reaching his goal, even though his rise to prominence began with a great deal of aggravation.

At the time he was managing the family textile business in Surat, a city in western India. The business was languishing, mainly because electricity was extremely expensive for businesses and the power grid was plagued with outages. It was a source of great annoyance for Tanti. In 1994, he ordered two wind turbines from Danish manufacturer Vestas, essentially taking his factory off the power grid.

Other business owners began showing an interest in his solution, prompting Tanti to wonder whether he might be in the wrong business. Wasn't wind energy the real business of the future? He discussed his ideas with his three brothers. Together they scraped together $600,000 (€387,000) in seed capital, founded Suzlon Energy and moved to Pune, a city near Bombay in southwestern India.

There was only one problem. None of the four brothers, all engineers, knew anything about wind energy. But as customers, they were all too familiar with the inadequacies of the industry. The turbines were supplied by the manufacturer, installed by another company and maintained by a third. By the time a turbine was up and running, the customer was often at his wits' end.

Tanti, realizing that a change was sorely needed, came up with the idea of offering a complete package of wind energy services. Suzlon would simply handle everything. Customers would not even have to install wind turbines on their own premises -- instead, a customer could buy a turbine at a faraway wind farm and would then own that turbine's output.

Without a Fight

The innovative aspect of Tanti's idea had more to do with the service he was providing than with any feat of engineering. But it was a concept that would revolutionize the wind energy business.

The brothers planned to purchase the sophisticated technology abroad, eventually producing the turbines in India, where low production costs would give them an unbeatable competitive edge. But there was only one problem: The leading European manufacturers were not about to give up their engineering achievements without a fight.

Suzlon was forced, grudgingly, to enter into joint venture agreements without gaining access to the technology. Tanti began his operations as a distributor of wind turbines manufactured by the German company Südwind. Despite his initial reluctance, the arrangement would prove to be a stroke of luck for Tanti's business.

Although Südwind, a small company founded by students at the Technical University of Berlin, built exceptional turbines, its engineer-owners knew very little about running a business. Südwind went into bankruptcy in the late 1990s and Tanti seized the opportunity, acquiring parts of the Germany company's R&D division. But instead of simply moving the technology to India, Tanti hired the former Südwind employees and set up an R&D laboratory in the northern German city of Rostock. Existing designs were fine-tuned at the laboratory, which also served as a training ground for young Indian technicians, who would later return to India to build turbines with their newly acquired expertise.

Similarly, Tanti managed to acquire a Dutch blade manufacturer. In 1999, when the Indian state of Maharashtra, where his business was located, passed a law that allowed companies to claim the costs of installing wind turbines as a tax deduction, Tanti had it made. By 2002 sales at Suzlon quadrupled to $131 million (€85 million).

One of the World's Top Wind Companies

Four years ago, investors urged him to sell the company. Tanti begged off, telling them: "In a few years, Suzlon will be buying up the leading European companies." As it turned out, he was right.

A trip to Pondicherry reveals that the Indians were already closing in on the Europeans at the time. The plant that Suzlon opened in this former French colony on India's east coast in 2004 can easily hold its own with Western competitors. The plant's enormous production buildings are well lit and almost clinically clean. Many of the men who assemble the turbines and sand the rotors there learned their trade at Tanti's German laboratories.

There are more than 1,200 workers at the Pondicherry plant, many with German expertise -- but being paid Indian salaries. It is these local production conditions that enable Suzlon to boast a 14 percent profit margin. The standard in the industry is 8 percent.

Three years ago, in 2005, Tanti converted his advantages over the competition into cash when he orchestrated a brilliant initial public offering. Suzlon raised $340 million (€219 million) and, from one day to the next, catapulted its founder and his family in the realm of the subcontinent's ultrarich. Tanti himself currently owns 16 percent of Suzlon, while the family owns 66 percent.

The down-to-earth Tantis have yet to succumb to megalomania. The company's Pune headquarters occupies a modest fifth floor of an office building. The 50-year-old CEO lives with his wife in a rented apartment next door to his brothers. Their two children attend university. The large clan gets together for meals as often as possible.

Tanti spends 300 days a year traveling, and yet he hasn't splurged on a private jet. Instead of acquiring these playthings of the nouveau riche, Tanti is far more interested in pursuing his plan: He is determined that Suzlon become one of the world's top three wind companies.

Acquisitions have helped the company reach fifth place on the list, helped along by perhaps its greatest coup of all: In 2007, Tanti suddenly entered the bidding for Repower, a major German wind turbine producer, and ended up outbidding the French nuclear energy giant Areva.

A Bump in the Road Ahead?

It wasn't cheap, but it was a sensation. In May 2007, Suzlon paid €450 million ($698 million) for 33.6 percent of Repower. It was the largest acquisition an Indian company had ever made in Germany.

But from the very beginning, the German turbine builders were never quite comfortable with their new bosses, fearing that their turbine blueprints would soon be copied in India. Tanti, who had assumed the chairmanship of Repower's supervisory board, insisted that he had no such intentions.

In fact, German corporation law would have made such a technology transfer impossible. Suzlon would have needed a subordination agreement to gain access to the blueprints. To that end, Tanti would have had to submit a takeover bid to Repower shareholders, but first would have had to acquire shares from the major shareholders, including Areva. The French had an option, exercisable after a year, to sell their stake in Repower.

The year had not yet expired before the first dispute erupted over whether Repower was being sucked dry by the Indians. Tanti was annoyed and publicly complained about the Hamburg-based company's lack of respect for his commitment. After all, he said, he was creating jobs. But he left no doubt that he wanted to gain a majority stake in Repower. That was exactly what the market wanted to hear. In mid-May, the company's stock price shot up to over €240 ($372), from €160 (€248) at the time of the takeover.

Tanti's problem was that the Areva shares, which he planned to acquire in late May, were suddenly very expensive. What he did next, though, no one saw coming. Four days before the expiration of Areva's sales option, he suggested, during a financial press conference in Mumbai, that Suzlon might consider selling some of its Repower shares to turn a profit.

Talking Down the Shares

The news had its desired effect. Repower fell from €240 to €200 ($310) a share. Executives at Repower's Hamburg headquarters were livid. It was unprecedented, a major shareholder talking down the company's share price.

Tanti's behavior triggered "major irritations," a company spokesman says diplomatically. The Indian's effort to appease the Germans in an e-mail had little effect, as did the news, a few days later, that he intended to buy the shares owned by Areva and the Spanish energy company Martifer after all.

Whatever the purpose of Tanti's maneuver was, it attracted the attention of Germany's Federal Supervisory Authority for Financial Services (BaFin). "There is no investigation underway, but we are observing the situation," says BaFin spokeswoman Anja Engelland. Her agency's interest in the case is likely to have increased significantly last week.

On Thursday, Suzlon announced its purchase of the Areva shares. According to traders, Tanti paid less than the current share price, but Areva was apparently satisfied to walk away with a profit of €350 million ($543 million). In addition, the Indians have quietly bought Repower shares on the market in recent days, bringing their stake in the company to 66 percent of its stock. This was not welcome news to investors and, on Friday, the Repower stock price dropped by 6.5 percent. Once again, concerns over a possible know-how transfer are making the rounds. Although a Suzlon spokesman called these concerns "pure speculation," the company didn't exactly deny that they were justified.

But, more recently, Tanti faces problems that could be far more threatening than disgruntlement at Repower. In the United States, Suzlon is currently experiencing the biggest debacle in its relatively short history. The Indians were forced to recall 1,251 rotor blades from a wind farm in the Midwest when many of the blades broke after being used for only a short period of time.

A Suzlon spokesman blames the broken blades on an unpredicted, strong shift in wind direction and says that the company now plans to reinforce the giant blades -- at an estimate cost of $30 million (€19 million). Industry insiders doubt that this will be enough. Repairs to a weak point in a blade are costly, they say, and usually last only a few years. Besides, Suzlon could face claims for damages from the customer.

Numbers Are Good

But Tulsi Tanti sees none of these problems as being insurmountable. He has faith in his numbers, and the numbers are good.

The company's sales grew by 71 percent, three times the industry average, in the last fiscal year. Suzlon's revenues amounted to $3.4 billion (€2.2 billion), and its pre-tax gain climbed to $480 million (€310 million). The company dominates the Indian market and holds a 14 percent share of the global market. Its factories are humming away in Pipestone, in the US state of Minnesota and in Tianjin, China. It has orders on the books worth $4.3 billion (€2.8 billion). And it plans to double annual production by 2010.

But there could be a bump in the road ahead. What happens if the advantages he reaps from being based in India begin to fade? Suzlon owes much of its success to lower production costs. What if they go up? Even Indian farmers, the ones who toil away in the fields next to the wind turbines, have figured out that someone is making a lot of money with those turbines. "Suddenly they're asking 20 times as much for their land," officials at Suzlon complain. Others want lease payments for the turbine sites, as well as compensation for the use of their right-of-way.

If Suzlon refuses to pay, the farmers block the access routes with their buffaloes. In 2007, 44 wind turbines, or one-third of total capacity, had to be shut down temporarily in Sangli because of such campaigns. In another location, the poverty-stricken rural population made off with aluminum ladders and copper cables from 63 new turbines and sold the valuable parts to scrap metal dealers.

In the village of Chikhli in the Satara district, angry residents recently caused turbines to be shut down, because they felt that real estate brokers had cheated them when they sold their land. Although the sales took place 10 years ago, the former landowners are convinced that there is still money to be had. Whether or not Suzlon decides to play along, the company will suffer the consequences.

Source: http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,559370,00.html

China on Pace to Become Global Leader in Renewable Energy

Nov. 19, 2007

China will likely achieve—and may even exceed—its target to obtain 15 percent of its energy from renewables by 2020, according to a new report released by the Worldwatch Institute. If China’s commitment to diversifying its energy supply and becoming a global leader in renewables manufacturing persists, renewable energy could provide over 30 percent of the nation’s energy by 2050.

That is the major conclusion of Powering China’s Development: The Role of Renewable Energy, written by Beijing-based researcher Eric Martinot, a Worldwatch senior fellow, and Li Junfeng, Vice Chair of China’s Renewable Energy Society in Beijing. “A combination of policy leadership and entrepreneurial savvy is leading to spectacular growth in renewable energy, increasing its share of the market for electricity, heating, and transport fuels,” said Martinot. “China is poised to become a leader in renewables manufacturing, which will have global implications for the future of the technology.”

More than $50 billion was invested in renewable energy worldwide in 2006, and China is expected to invest over $10 billion in new renewables capacity in 2007, second only to Germany. Wind and solar energy are expanding particularly rapidly in China, with production of wind turbines and solar cells both doubling in 2006. China is poised to pass world solar and wind manufacturing leaders in Europe, Japan, and North America in the next three years, and it already dominates the markets for solar hot water and small hydropower.

“Our ingenuity and manufacturing prowess are being harnessed to provide leadership to the world on renewables,” said Li Junfeng. “China’s position provides a strong example for other developing countries, while helping to drive down renewable energy costs to become competitive with fossil fuels for all countries the world over.”

The report discusses China’s advances in wind power, solar photovoltaics (PV), solar heating, biomass power, and biofuels. Impressive gains in these sectors include:

Wind power is the fastest growing power-generation technology in China, with existing capacity doubling during 2006 alone. By 2007, China was home to four major Chinese manufacturers of wind turbines, another six foreign subsidiary manufacturers, and more than 40 firms developing prototypes and aspiring to produce turbines commercially.
Solar PV production capacity in China jumped from 350 megawatts (MW) in 2005 to over 1,000 MW in 2006, with 1,500 MW expected in 2007. With high-profile initial public stock offerings for several Chinese companies, some valued in the billions of dollars, global attention has been riveted to China’s solar PV industry.

Growth in solar hot water systems has been rapid, rising from 35 million square meters of installed capacity in 2000 to 100 million square meters by the end of 2006. China added 20 million square meters of new capacity in 2006 alone. Chinese companies now produce the solar heaters—an increasingly desirable consumer appliance—at costs one-fifth to one-eighth those found in the United States and Europe.

Wastes from agricultural facilities in China could yield 80 billion cubic meters of biogas annually, well above the government’s target of 44 billion cubic meters annually by 2020. In 2006, China had about 2 gigawatts (GW) of biomass power generation capacity, mostly from combined heat-and-power (CHP) plants with sugarcane waste as the primary feedstock.

Total ethanol production in China in 2006 was about 1 billion liters, compared with global production of 37 billion liters, primarily in the United States and Brazil. Higher corn prices and concern about competition with food supplies led to a moratorium on corn-based ethanol, leaving sorghum, cassava, and sugar cane as the current feedstocks of choice. Prospects for significant ethanol expansion in China rest primarily on the future of cellulose-to-ethanol technology, the viability of which experts expect will be proven within the next 10 years.

With its booming economy and rapidly expanding energy consumption—particularly its use of coal and oil—it is imperative for China to diversify its energy supplies. The country has suffered frequent power shortages due to its breakneck economic development. China’s urban population, which uses nearly three times more electricity and commercial energy per person than rural residents do, increased from 375 million in 1999 to 577 million in 2006. The country’s automobile fleet also continues to balloon, with an estimated 1,000 new cars appearing on Beijing’s streets every day.

Coal now provides 80 percent of China’s electricity, and national electricity demand doubled between 2000 and 2006. As a result, China’s economic development, environment, and public health are severely affected: for example, only 1 percent of urban Chinese breathe air that meets European air quality standards. Coal generation also leads to the build up of toxic metals, such as mercury, in water supplies and on agricultural fields throughout China.

China’s carbon dioxide emissions are on the rise and are expected to exceed total U.S. carbon dioxide emissions shortly, although Chinese per-capita emissions remain about one-sixth those of the United States. Nuclear power provides just 7 GW of China’s electric capacity, and even with the additional plants planned in the next few decades, it is unlikely to provide more than 5 percent of the country’s electricity.

Worldwatch President Christopher Flavin praised China’s growing commitment to renewables: “The combination of ambitious targets supported by strong government policies and entrepreneurial acumen may soon allow China’s renewable energy sector to ’leapfrog’ many developed nations.”

Source: http://air.environmental-expert.com/resultEachPressRelease.aspx?cid=26998&codi=22782&idproducttype=6&level=1

China’s wind power development exceeds expectations

Jun. 2, 2008

A recent boom in Chinese wind power development has surpassed the government's original target and forced policymakers to set a new goal that might still be too modest. In 2007, cumulative wind installations in China exceeded 5 gigawatts (GW), the goal originally set for 2010 by the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), China's top economic planner. The Commission had set the target in its 2006 mid- and long-term development plan for renewable energy. The plan's target for 2020 was 30 GW, a level that is now projected to be reached by 2012, eight years ahead of schedule.

In March, the NDRC revised its mid-term target, doubling it from 5 GW to 10 GW for 2010. Yet this new goal is still too modest, with wind installations likely to reach 20 GW by 2010 and 100 GW by 2020. China is witnessing the start of a golden age of wind power development, and the magnitude of growth has caught even policymakers off guard.

China's wind power sector has experienced tremendous development since early 2005, when the government enacted its landmark national renewable energy law. Added installed capacity grew by over 60 percent in 2005, and it more than doubled in both 2006 and 2007. By the end of 2007, cumulative capacity had reached roughly 6 GW, ranking China fifth in the world in wind installations. The country added 3.3 GW in 2007 alone, trailing only the United States and Spain. In total, the world installed 94 GW of wind power that year, with Germany accounting for about 20 GW and the United States 16 GW.

The breathtaking growth of Chinese wind power illustrates how effective government policy can influence the market. Since the issuing of the renewable energy law, the government has enacted a series of policies to facilitate wind power development. One important step has been to improve the wind power pricing regulation, which uses a competitive bidding process to determine the price of wind power. Through five rounds of public tendering to issue wind concessions, policymakers have explored ways to further improve pricing and disperse worries in the industry about excessively low bidding hindering further development.

By 2007, the NDRC had evaluated and approved pricing schemes for more than 60 projects, taking into consideration local conditions and other major benchmarks, including a provision that a minimum of 70 percent of a wind turbine's components be manufactured locally. The more sophisticated pricing schemes have stabilized China's wind power market, while the benchmark of turbine localization has provided market-entry opportunities for fledging domestic manufacturers. The government also supports wind power through tax incentives and subsidies.

In addition to policies and regulations related directly to renewable energy and wind power, climate change considerations have played a major role in encouraging China's wind sector. As the only country in the world that has set up a national leading group for responding to climate change, headed by Premier Wen Jiabao, China is stressing measures to tackle the challenge through all levels of government. Developing a low-carbon economy and using cleaner, renewable energy sources provide an attractive option. As a result, regions with rich wind resources are readily embracing wind power development; Inner Mongolia, Gansu, and Jiangsu are all embarking on constructing 10 GW wind power bases.

Policy incentives and government prioritization have sent a clear signal to the market, and investors are springing into the nascent realm for big growth. What has surprised even policymakers is the exponential growth of China's domestic wind turbine manufacturing industry. Only a few small turbine manufacturers existed before 2005, and most turbines and key components were imported. Over the past three years, however, domestic manufacturers have increased their investment and expanded quickly, while all major international wind turbine manufacturers have started to set up local factories.

By 2007, China's turbine manufacturing capacity exceeded 3 GW. It is expected to double in 2008, roughly sufficient to meet domestic needs for the equipment. The country is projected to see 10-15 GW of wind turbine capacity by 2012-not only meeting domestic demands, but also becoming a major exporter of wind turbines.

Domestic wind turbine technology is catching up quickly. Before 2005, China was able to manufacture turbines of only up to 600 kilowatts (kW). But policy incentives have helped to accelerate technological upgrades. The country made its first 750 kW turbine in 2005, which became the mainstream market type for 2006 and 2007. In 2006, China produced its own 1,500 kW wind turbines, which entered the market in large quantities in 2007. In late 2007, the first 2,000 kW turbine was ready for testing, and it is expected to enter the market in 2008. Meanwhile, the country is developing a 3,000 kW turbine, projected to be ready for testing in 2009. The accelerated progress has narrowed the technological gap between domestic manufacturers and top international producers.

The latest powerful push came in late 2007 from the State Council, the country's top policymaking body. In its white paper on national energy policies, the Council stressed energy diversification and prioritized clean and low-carbon energy. For the first time, it also eliminated the chronic rhetoric of 'using coal as the primary energy source.' China's draft energy law, currently in the comment-seeking period, will provide a more solid policy framework for renewable energy development once finalized.

Currently, coal-fired power still provides the lion's share of China's energy, at roughly 70 percent. In 2007, the country added some 88.3 GW of coal-power generation capacity, an increase of 14.6 percent. However, the country registered a decline of 9 percent in coal-power capacity in 2006.

Wind power is said to already be more cost effective than oil, natural gas, and nuclear power generation in China. As the stability and predictability of the sector attract greater investment, it is widely believed that wind power will be able to compete with coal generation by as early as 2015. That will be the turning point in China, which by then will be the world's largest energy consumer.

Source: Worldwatch Institute
http://www.environmental-expert.com/resultEachPressRelease.aspx?cid=28754&codi=32526&idproducttype=8&level=0

China Sandstorms vs. Wind Power

World News - China
June 26, 2008


A boost to the development of wind power in China will not only help to cut carbon dioxide emission but also serve as a buffer zone for sandstorms in northern China, energy expert Huang Yicheng, said on Wednesday. Huang, also the country's former energy minister, explained that establishment of big wind power stations with the installtion of windmills in northwestern China will like a shield to reduce wind velocity.

Huang said it was sifficult to forecast the effect, but it would definitely help north China including Olympic Beijing to go through fewer sandstorms in winter and spring. He said during the ongoing 5th Asian wind energy exhibition and conference that in recent years 80 percent of China's newly-added annual 100 million kilowatts power capacity was fuelled by coal, which added new pressure to coal supply and enviromental protection goals.

He estimated that the wind power resources on the country's land stood at 700 million kilowatts, of which 300 to 400 million kilowatts was workable. Figures showed that Chinese installed wind power capacity reached 6 million kilowatts by 2007, coming behind Germany, the United States, Spain and India, while the combined wind energy installation underway is 4.2 million kilowatts.

To meet mounting demand for electricity from both domestic civilian and industrial users, the country has stressed renewable and clean energy in recent years. Zhou Xi'an, an official from the Office of the National Energy Leading Group, said China is endeavouring to build "wind power three gorges" projects in northwestern Gansu Province, eastern Jiangsu Province and northern Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.

Zhou predicted that the installed wind power capacity will top 10 million kilowatts by the end of this year and 20 million kilowatts in 2010.

Source: http://www.windenergynews.com/content/view/1327/45/

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Taipower may close in 2010

April 17th 2008
The China Post news staff


TAIPEI, Taiwan -- State-run Taiwan Power Co. (Taipower) would be forced to shut down its operations in 2010 if domestic electricity rates see no price hike within the next few months, a top Taipower executive warned yesterday.

Chairman Chen Kuei-ming of Taipower issued the warning at a budget screening session held by the economics and energy committee of the Legislative Yuan.

During the session, lawmakers voiced concerns over when Taipower will raise its electricity rates.

Lawmaker Lin Chang-min of the opposition Kuomintang said there are many factors leading to the operating losses of Taipower, including spiraling fuel costs, inappropriate suspension of the construction of the No. 4 nuclear plant during the initial years of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) rule, and interest payments for investments in Honduras.

Meanwhile, Lawmaker Lee Chun-yi of the DPP said he opposed hiking domestic power rates before the new government takes office on May 20. Lee said adjusting the power rates is a major government policy, and should therefore be up to the new government to make the final decision.

In response, Chen said that if the state-run CPC Corp. Taiwan decides not to hike its oil prices, then Taipower would suffer operating losses of NT$130 billion to NT$150 billion a year.

Chen continued that if CPC raises its oil prices and Taipower still keeps power rates unchanged, then the company would witness larger annual operating losses of NT$200 billion. In this case, Taipower's capitalization would be undermined in 2009, and the company would be forced to close its operations in 2010.

Chen said if the new government decides to raise oil prices on June 1, then Taipower had better follow suit one month later. And in order to make ends meet, he stressed, electricity rates should be hiked by at least 50 percent.

But in order to prevent the rate hike from affecting the livelihood of local people, Chen suggested that the 50 percent hike can be carried out in two stages, with 30 percent in the first stage and 20 percent in the second stage.

Based on the average rate of NT$2.15 for one kilowatt per hour recorded in 2007, the 30 percent hike would translate into an increase of NT$0.65 per kilowatt an hour. The new rate would reach NT$2.8 per kilowatt an hour.

In related news, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Ministry of National Defense have reached a consensus that the preferential power rates for military servicemen and their family members would be fully scrapped in three years. Based on the agreement, starting 2009, one third of the total power rate reduction for military servicemen and family members will be canceled per year. Accordingly, the preferential rates would be totally scrapped in 2012.

The move is designed to reduce the operating losses of Taipower, according to Vice Economics Minister Hsieh Fa-ta.

Hsieh said that under the preferential power rate scheme, military servicemen and their family members can enjoy a 50 percent discount for their power rates if the monthly power consumption remains under 500 kilowatts per hour, followed by a 30 percent discount for consumption of 501 to 1,000 kilowatts per hour.

The discounts have made Taipower's total electricity revenues shrink by NT$640 million a year.

Source: http://www.chinapost.com.tw/business/asia/%20taiwan/2008/04/17/152247/Taipower-may.htm

Taipower warns of capital erosion

May 7th 2008
The state-run Taiwan Power Co (Taipower, 台電) said its losses would expand to NT$154.7 billion (US$5.07 billion) by the end of the year, barring changes in current electricity rates, a company executive said yesterday.
“Taipower is considering an initial hike in electricity tariffs by 30 percent by the end of this year to cut losses while lessening the burden on the public,” Taipower chief engineer Tu Yueh-yuan (杜悅元) said yesterday.

Although unlikely, Taipower said that it would have to raise electricity tariffs by 68.54 percent to break even this year, up from the 48 percent that Taipower chairman Edward Chen (陳貴明) estimated in March.

Aside from rising international crude oil prices, which have exceeded US$120 per barrel, prices of coal surged by nearly 135 percent to US$126.83 per tonne in March from US$54 a year ago, Tu said.

Moreover, prices of fuel oil, diesel and liquefied natural gas have risen by 75 percent, 49 percent and 42 percent respectively this year compared with prices in 2006, the company said in its latest report.

If the company’s losses cannot be addressed, Taipower will start eroding its capital base of NT$330 billion this year.

Accumulated losses would be greater than half of the company’s capital base by next year, and Taipower would be forced to close down operations in 2010, the company said.

“If Taipower can keep our losses under NT$46.5 billion this year, it will not erode the company’s capital base,” Tu said.

Taipower raised tariffs by an average 5.8 percent in July 2006, its first increase in 23 years.

The company has not adjusted rates since that time because of price controls meant to act against increasing inflationary pressure.

On Monday, the government’s statistics bureau said the consumer price index rose 3.86 percent year-on-year last month, after an annual rise of 3.95 percent in the previous month.

“Risks to inflation remain on the upside in the near term due to continued pressure on global fuel and commodity prices,” Deutsche Bank said in an e-mailed statement sent to the Taipei Times yesterday.

Source: http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/biz/archives/2008/05/07/2003411222

Taipower suffered net loss of NT$23.25 billion in 2007

June 22nd 2008
TAIPEI, Taiwan -- State-run Taiwan Power Company (Taipower), Taiwan's only power distributor, posted a net loss of NT$23.25 billion (US$762 million) in 2007 because of the soaring cost of international energy resources, company Chairman Edward Chen said Friday.

"Last year the company spent a total of NT$4.46 trillion, NT$31.25 billion higher than our total revenues of NT$4.15 trillion," Chen said at a shareholders meeting where he announced the company's 2007 results.

"This NT$31.25 billion deficit marked a huge increase of NT$28.42 billion compared with the 2006 deficit of NT$2.81 billion," he added.

An income tax benefit of NT$7.98 billion helped trim the company's net loss in 2007 to NT$23.26 billion, the Taipower chairman said.

Chen attributed the company's woes to skyrocketing international oil and coal prices, with electricity prices, frozen under the former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration since July 2006, unable to reflect the rising costs.

Rapidly, rising oil and coal prices hit the company even harder in the first five months of 2008, during which it posted a pre-tax loss of NT$ 47.9 billion, more than three times the NT$15.5 billion pre-tax loss registered over the same period of 2007.

International prices of crude oil and coal have risen by 46 percent and 50 percent respectively since January 2008 to reach US$130.62 a barrel and US$150 a ton. The two fuels accounted for half of the company's power generation in 2006.

The 5.8 percent increase in electricity prices allowed in July 2006 were the first hikes in 23 years, but with the soaring cost of inputs, the company has been appealing for a new round of price increases.

The new Kuomintang government has agreed to a 12.6 percent hike in electricity prices on July 1 and another 12.6 percent increase on October 1 to reflect the higher cost of raw materials and stem the state-run company's losses.

"The company is also working on ways to boost operational efficiency, with measures including cutting down the procurement price of fuels," Chen said.

Hoping that price adjustments would be made in a more timely fashion in the future, Chen warned that the company would not be able to construct new power-generating facilities should it continue to run a deficit in the coming years.

"The problem will also hurt the company's capital position," he told shareholders.

To make up for the NT$23.26 billion loss, Taipower said it has used the company's NT$1.99 billion legal surplus earned in previous years, as well as another NT$21.26 billion from the company's legal reserve.

Source: http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/%20business/2008/06/22/162096/Taipower-suffered.htm

Taipower's wind turbines dogged by malfunctions

Jun 24th 2008
HOT AIR: Taipower blamed Taiwan's hot weather for the high rate of breakdowns, presenting a significant setback to the government's renewable energy policy

Of the 82 wind turbines that make up Taiwan Power Co's (Taipower, (台電) wind-powered energy generation plans, as many as 51 turbines have at one time or another been inoperative.
Taipower blames the high rate of malfunctioning on Taiwan’s hot climate and lack of supporting equipment. The high rate of breakdown is a significant setback to the implementation of the government’s renewable energy policy.

To meet government targets for clean energy, Taipower planned to invest NT$19 billion (US$624 million) in 180 wind turbines, with a total capacity of 330,000 kilowatts, between 2003 and 2010. However, to date, only 82 have been completed, with the malfunction rate reaching a high 62 percent.

Taipower said that, of the malfunctioning turbines, three were manufactured by GE, 22 by Harakosan and six by Gamesa. Most of the turbines are distributed along the western shoreline.

In terms of generation, the 82 completed turbines have generated 560 million kilowatt-hours of electricity. At NT$2 per kilowatt-hour, the turbines have generated NT$1.12 billion, a miniscule sum compared with its investment of nearly NT$10 billion.

As for capacity utilization, only the turbines in Penghu County and Changhua County were able to operate at 47 percent and 35 percent respectively. In other areas, such as in Shihmen (石門), Taipei County, and Hengchun (恆春), Pingtung County, the turbines were operating at less than 30 percent capacity.

Commenting on the major problems surrounding wind power generation, an unnamed director from Taipower described the situation as “utterly ridiculous.” Some Taipower staff also questioned the fact that the department in charge of wind-power generation had not been held responsible nor faced disciplinary action.

Sources say that the 51 faulty turbines were all contract based on the most advantageous, rather than the lowest, bids.

Source: http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2008/06/24/2003415612

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Use of wind power growing in Taiwan

The use of wind power will play a major role in Taiwan's efforts to increase its use of renewable energy, according to officials from the Bureau of Energy (BOE) under the Ministry of Economic Affairs.

The BOE has set a target for Taiwan to generate 10% of its energy needs using renewable energy by 2010, with wind power making up 80% of renewable energy.

Taiwan's west coast is currently home to over 100 wind turbines on 13 farms, which produce over 420 million kilowatt-hours of electricity a year, or enough power for 105,000 households, said BOE officials at a recent ceremony promoting the use of renewable energy at Changhua Coastal Industrial Park.

The wind turbines currently in use are sufficient to prevent 250,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions, said BOE officials.

The new windmills at Changhua Coastal Industrial Park were built by state-run Taiwan Power (Taipower), local company Tien-Lung Paper and InfraVest Wind Power Group of Germany, which build the first wind farm in Taiwan in 2000.

Additional windmills are being built by state-run Taipower in western coastal areas and the outer islands of Penghu, which will create an additional 500 megawatt capacity, said officials.

With six months of strong northwesterly winds every year, Taiwan's coastal areas are well-suited for the development of wind power, said the officials.

(Taipei Times, Central News Agency)
News Resource: http://investintaiwan.nat.gov.tw/en/news/200705/2007053001.html

MOEA to allow offshore wind power development next year, offering NTD 40 billion in opportunities

The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) has completed the necessary application guidelines for a program allowing companies to develop offshore wind power. The ministry plans to start accepting applications starting Jan. 1 next year, according to the Economic Daily News.

The program to develop offshore wind power, entitled the "Program for the First Stage Installation of Offshore Wind Power Generation Facilities", was drafted by the MOEA Bureau of Energy (BOE).

During the first-stage of the program, companies will be able to build wind power turbines in six main areas along Taiwan's coasts. Up to 300,000 kilowatts of power are expected to be developed, bringing in least NTD 40 billion in business opportunities. Most of the wind turbines will be built along Taiwan's western coast and Penghu, one of the ROC's largest outlying island territories.

China Steel, Formosa Heavy Industries Corp, and TECO are all actively looking into entering the business, according to reports.

In the future, applicants wishing to build offshore wind turbine systems will be held to a threshold of at least 2,000 hours per year, and 4,000 per year in Penghu. The BOE draft regulations define 'offshore' as sensitive tidal flats clear of high-water and low water marks, and focusing on ocean areas outside of low water marks. Companies receiving permission to develop are required to complete their facilities within three years, or lose their permission to continue development.

As for electricity rates for offshore wind power generation, the MOEA plans to wait until a set of draft regulations on renewable energy has been passed next year to determine prices. After passage, the current price of land-based wind-generated electricity will be raised from NTD 2 to NTD 2.7 per kilowatt-hour.

Wind power generation is part of the government's active efforts at promoting renewable energy, and land wind power generation will continued to be developed in order to encourage private companies to invest in wind power generation, said the MOEA.

With currently 121 stations already completed, the MOEA looks to encourage private investors to develop approximately 699,000 kilowatts of power. The ministry projects that in 2010, domestic wind power generation volume could reach over 1.223 million kilowatts with a yearly generation of 3.3 billion kilowatt-hours, providing one year's worth of power to nearly 825,000 households.

News Resource: http://investintaiwan.nat.gov.tw/en/news/200709/2007090701.html

Taiwan taking active stance on energy efficiency: MOEA Minister

Taiwan is taking an active stance on energy efficiency, and the government has set a 33% energy efficiency target by 2025, said Minister of Economic Affairs Steve Chen.

This target is higher than Japan's commitment to APEC, which holds a 25%-26% energy efficiency target, Chen noted in remarks at the 61st annual meeting of the Chinese National Federation of Industries (CFNI).

President Chen Shui-bian, who also addressed the meeting, said that Taiwan must be prepared for the "age of high oil prices", and that Taiwan would proactively develop clean energy, such as solar and wind power and biofuels. This would help reduce Taiwan's reliance on imported oil while contributing to the reduction of greenhouse gases, he said.

Minister Steve Chen said that in comparison to other countries, Taiwan has been active in promoting energy efficiency, noting that the government is currently assisting 200 major energy users (companies and organizations) in implementing energy-saving measures.

Minister Chen said that the government aims for renewable energy capacity to account for 15% of the nation's energy by 2025. This would be equivalent to 8.45 million kilowatts, capable of producing 28.7 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity.

With 155 wind turbines expected to be completed by the end of the year, Taiwan is seeing the emergence of a number of related industries such as blade manufacturing, said Minister Chen.

In addition, wind-generated power could create as much as 8.9 billion kilowatt hours of electricity by 2025, comparable to 2.3 times the capacity of Linkou's thermal power plants, he said.

Many domestic companies are now entering the solar energy generation industry, and conservative estimates are projecting that 1.2 billion kilowatt hours of electricity will be produced through solar power by 2025, said Minister Chen.

News Resource: http://investintaiwan.nat.gov.tw/en/news/200711/2007112601.html

Wind energy cuts CO2 emissions in Taiwan by 250,000 tons a year

The number of wind turbines along Taiwan's west coast now surpasses 100, and the renewable energy generated by these units is sufficient to prevent the emission of 250,000 tons of carbon dioxide a year, energy officials said yesterday.

At a ceremony held in the Changhua Coastal Industrial Park to promote the use of wind power, officials from the Bureau of Energy under the Ministry of Economic Affairs said the 103 giant wind turbines located in 13 wind farms along Taiwan's west coast can generate 420 million kilowatt-hours of electricity a year -- enough to power 105,000

The windmills were established by Taiwan Power Co. (Taipower), the private-run Tien Lung Paper Co. and InfraVest Wind Power Group, a German company which entered the market in 2000 as the first wind farm builder in Taiwan.

According to the officials, more windmills are under construction in west coastal areas and the outlying island group of Penghu, with an additional total capacity of 500 megawatts. Each unit will cost at least NT$100 million.

They said Taiwan's coastal areas are ideal for the development of wind power because they have six months of strong northwest winds each year, with an average wind speed of five to six meters per second.

The Bureau of Energy has set the target of generating enough renewable energy to meet 10 percent of Taiwan's electricity needs by 2010, with wind power making up 80 percent of the renewable energy.

Taipower, the sole electricity supplier in Taiwan, began to harness wind energy in 2002 and plans to establish 200 wind turbines in Taiwan and Penghu by 2010.

Taipower's long-term wind power development plant will build an additional 546 wind turbines between 2010 and 2020 in shallow waters off Taiwan's west coast and Penghu, with a total capacity of 1,980 megawatts at an estimated cost of NT$200 million each.

Out of the 546 windmills, 176 will be built off Penghu, and the electricity generated by these units will be transmitted to Taiwan through a 40-km undersea cable.

The other 370 units will be established 10 to 15 km off the coast of Changhua and Yunlin counties, according to Taipower.

News Resource: http://www.chinapost.com.tw/news/archives/taiwan/2007423/107807.htm